Grading

The grading scheme and schedule for the course is as follows.
DeliverableWeightDueNote
Proposal5%Monday Nov 14 2016 9amVia OnQ
First class sessionMonday Jan 9 2017 9:30-11:30 amsole in-class session
Report25%Saturday Apr 15 2017, 9am (week 12)Via OnQ, 2 day grace period
Work50%Saturday Apr 15 2017, 9am (week 12)Via OnQ, 2-day grace period
Presentation20%Creative Computing Day
Thurday Apr 6 2017 (week 12)
Biosciences Atrium
There is 2-day grace period for the proposal, report, and work, but using it incurs a 10% penalty to the grade for that item. Missing the grace period will incur an F.

Each deliverable will be letter-graded, converted to percentages according to the following table, modified by any appropriate penalties, combined according to the weights given above, and the final total converted to letter grades according to the University's standard table:
Numeric RangeLetterNumberDescription
90-100A+93Exceptional. Indicates exceptional performance that exceeds the highest standards. The course content has been mastered, the ability to apply the material in new ways has been demonstrated, and an understanding of the wider context is evident, all to an exceptional degree.
85-89A87Outstanding. Indicates outstanding performance that meets the highest standards. The course content has been mastered, the ability to apply the material in new ways has been demonstrated, and an understanding of the wider context is evident.
80-84A-82Excellent. Indicates excellent performance that meets very high standards. Mastery of the course material and ability to apply the material in new ways have been demonstrated.
77-79B+78Very Good. Indicates very good performance that meets high standards. The course content has been mastered, with a comprehensive understanding of concepts and techniques.
73-76B75Good. Indicates good comprehension of the course material. The expectations set for the course have been met.
70-72B-72Reasonably Good. Indicates reasonably good comprehension of the course material. Most expectations set for the course have been met.
67-69C+68Acceptable. Indicates an acceptable comprehension of the course material, meeting and in some cases exceeding basic standards.
63-66C65Minimally Acceptable (Honours). Indicates a generally acceptable comprehension of the course material, meeting basic standards.
60-62C-62Minimally Acceptable (General). Indicates a minimally acceptable comprehension of the course material while falling short of basic standards in some areas.
57-59D+58Unsatisfactory Pass. Comprehension of the course material was unsatisfactory, but sufficient for credit to be granted.
53-56D55
50-52D-52
49 and belowF0Failure. Indicates that the minimum standards have not been met. Credit has not been granted.
Descriptions are taken from the 2015-16 version of Regulation 10.1 of the Faculty of Arts and Science Academic Regulations.


Questions? Contact the course coordinator.
This page last modified